- Ross, Mitchell S. 'Rethinking Diplomatic Immunity: A Review of Remedial Approaches to Address the Abuses of Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities.' American University International Law Review 4, no.
- PROPERTY AND DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY HAZEL Fox. I. INTRODUCTION IN 1978 with the enactment of the State Immunity Act the restrictive doctrine of immunity from suit of a foreign State before English courts. 34 Claims against a general bank account of the embassy of a foreign State.
- Diplomatic Immunity Vol 10
- Diplomatic Immunity Vol 1 Summary
- Diplomatic Immunity Vol 1 Cast
- Diplomatic Immunity Vol 1 Pdf
Indeed, diplomatic immunity ratione materiae for former diplomats under Article 39 (2) of the VCDR merely represents the codification of a pre-existing general rule which grants (absolute) state immunity to all state officials when they have acted on behalf of their state. The Diplomatic Relations Act, contains provisions to: 1) repeal the old immunity provisions, 22 U.S.C. §§ 252-54; 2) extend Vienna Convention privileges and immunities to diplomatic personnel from countries which have not ratified the Convention; 3) allow the President to grant. The 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations is a treaty between countries which generally grants to the official representative of a country certain privileges by the receiving country, on the presumption of reciprocity, e.g. We will grant immunity from prosecution to your official diplomats in our country as long as you do the same for ours when they're in your country.
Copy Citation
Diplomatic Immunity Vol 10
Export Citation
With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.
Already have an account? Log in
Monthly Plan
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
Yearly Plan
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
SJLS is run by the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore from which it draws its Editorial Committee.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
University of Malaya Law Review © 1961 National University of Singapore (Faculty of Law)
Request Permissions
Copy Citation
Export Citation
With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.
Already have an account? Log in
Diplomatic Immunity Vol 1 Summary
Monthly Plan
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
Yearly Plan
Diplomatic Immunity Vol 1 Cast
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
Purchase a PDF
How does it work?
- Select the purchase option.
- Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
- Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.
- Access supplemental materials and multimedia.
- Unlimited access to purchased articles.
- Ability to save and export citations.
- Custom alerts when new content is added.
When founded in 1952, the International and Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ) was unique. It was the only journal which offered the reader coverage of comparative law as well as public and private international law. It has maintained its pre-eminence as one of the most important journals of its kind encompassing Human Rights and European Law. It continues to offer practitioners and academics wide topical coverage without compromising rigorous editorial standards.
Diplomatic Immunity Vol 1 Pdf
Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries.Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The International and Comparative Law Quarterly © 1985 Cambridge University Press
Request Permissions